Friday, May 27, 2005
Contributors
10 Game Segments
- Segment 1: 2-8
- Segment 2: 5-5
- Segment 3: 3-7
- Segment 4: 3-7
- Segment 5: 7-3
- Segment 6: 7-3
- Segment 7: 4-6
- Segment 8: 2-8
- Segment 9: 5-5
- Segment 10: 6-4
- Segment 11: 4-4
Royals Watch
- Nationals (48-60) 10 games ahead of the Royals (38-70).
ERV Scoring
- ERV Scoring FAQ
- ERV Boxscore Guide
- Win Value Explained Here and Here
- Background Posts: Here and here
Previous Posts
- Bill James on the Sacrifice Bunt
- Sac Bunt: The 1-Run Gambit
- The Training Staff
- Frank, Part Deux
- ERV Boxscore for May 25, at Cincinnati
- ERV Boxscore for May 24, at Cincinnati
- You MUST pinch hit in that situation!!!
- Injuries and losses to bad teams
- Frank
- I'll Comment On Guzman
Nats Links
- Official Team Page
- ESPN Team Clubhouse
- Nats Hitting Stats
- Nats Pitching Stats
- Nats AAA Stats
- Nats AA Stats
- Nats High-A Stats
- Nats Low-A Stats
Nats Blogs
- Ball Wonk!
- Capitol Punishment
- District of Baseball
- Distinguished Senators
- Federal Baseball
- Nasty Nats
- Nationals Farm Authority
- Curly W
- Nationals Interest
- Nats Triple Play
- Just a Nats Fan
- Banks of the Anacostia
- OMG
- Yuda's Gameday Chats
General Baseball Links
Other Sports Links
E-Mail Nats Blog
Site Feeds
Copyright Info
- Go ahead. Try us.



6 Comments:
What does it say when the RV of your worst player cancels out the RV of your three best players?
Ugh.
And again, the ugliness that is Cristain Guzman's season raises its ugly head -- I was wondering (if it's not too much trouble, of course) if you might put in a "Change from last week" column for RV and/or WV -- it would be interesting
I'd be interested to see what Jamey Carroll's #s looked like without all of those godforsaken sacrifice bunts.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Unfortunately, there is a major correction to be made to the charts of which I have made DM aware. The totals don't actually include Guzman. Meaning that the mediocrity that you see is actually the team without Cristian and adding his totals in moves us from mediocrity to "UGH."
My spreadsheet is so complicated that it now has a mind of its own, and it simply could not comprehend that a major league roster has a player like Guzman on it, so it assumed it was a mistake and excluded him. I'll correct that tonight.
As for the requests, I'll post the Jamey Carroll sans bunts number -- my guess is he loses about 0.21 RV for each one, so he would be about 1.5 to 2.0 RV higher without them.
As for change from last week, that is harder to do, which it means it is more likely that I will spend all weekend figuring out how to do it, because I like the challenge.
Post a Comment
<< Home